Hakkattack wrote:
f1aroo wrote:
Peter Windsor or Will Buxton???
I prefer Windsor....
Me too but I have grown to really like Will. Peter comes off as the more knowledgable and more professional (not to say Will isn't professional because he is so perhaps a more befitting word would be regal?) where as Will comes off as a bit more enthusiastic. I just don't care for Will's bouncing and excessive hand gesturing during commentary.
RaggedMan wrote:
f1aroo wrote:
Peter Windsor or Will Buxton???
I hated Buxton at first, but he has grown on me.
I'm still kind of put off Windsor after the USF1 debacle.

When are people going to get off Peter's back for the USF1 debacle? The man had a dream of owning and fielding his own F1 team and he did all he could to make that happen. Getting into F1 is a tremendously difficult thing to achieve and from everything I've read, Peter held up his end of it and most of the blame for its catastrophic failure lies on Ken Anderson yet you rarely, if ever read or hear anyone mention his name. It's not fair that because Peter is the most recognizable of the 2, he gets all the blame for what happened. It's already old news and either way, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that Peter is an excellent F1 Journalist who still has a great deal to offer in more ways than one and anyone who can't separate the two really needs to reevaluate the situations and move forward with life. I feel that had Peter chosen someone other than Ken Anderson USF1 would've been on the grid on time for 2010 and would have participated in austin last week at their home grand prix. These things happen and we learn and move on which is what Peter has done. I don't know if he's given up on his dream just yet, but I hope for his sake he hasn't and I wish him the best as that's all he's given all of us.