planetf1.com

It is currently Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:24 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please read the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 6788
Location: Nebraska, USA
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)

_________________
Forza Ferrari
WCCs = 16
WDCs = 15


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 16681
Blake wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)


Not really. There was a good wave 00-02.

The drivers from that wave came in and pretty beat most of the top end of the grid from the generation before. Villeneuve and Barrichello got beat by Button, Coulthard got beat by Kimi, Fissichella got beat by Alonso etc.


Last edited by mikeyg123 on Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 7628
Location: Michigan, USA
mikeyg123 wrote:
The drivers from that wave came in and pretty beat most of the top end of the grid from the generation before. Violence and Barrichello got beat by Button, Coulthard got beat by Kimi, Fissichella got beat by Alonso etc.

Violence? Auto-correct of Villeneuve?

_________________
PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 15 podiums): 3rd in 2016
TOP THREE CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): Champions in 2015 & 2018 | 2nd in 2017 & 2019
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 USA & P-F1 Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 16681
Exediron wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
The drivers from that wave came in and pretty beat most of the top end of the grid from the generation before. Violence and Barrichello got beat by Button, Coulthard got beat by Kimi, Fissichella got beat by Alonso etc.

Violence? Auto-correct of Villeneuve?


:lol: :lol: Corrected!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Yeah that's utter nonsense I'm afraid. Of course he had competition and was challenged. He won 7 titles. How may of them ended in 1-2s with his team mate? He had to fight for most of them and the way people talk it's like he could just cruise around and take it easy. People seem to forget it's not a spec series and drivers are fighting other cars as much as they are other drivers. And it's not so long ago that people were praising Mika Hakkinen but now all of a sudden he doesn't count?

It's arguable that all but two of the titles Schumacher won may not have been won by a Benetton/Ferrari driver had Schumacher not been the driver in their car. He made the difference to the team and that's the reason he's considered a legend. In 1994 he only failed to finish 1st on two occasions when he finished a race, and then he finished 2nd. Yet when he had to sit out four races his team mates only just scraped two third places between them. The Benetton would have looked like a midfield car if almost any other driver would have been in it and it's doubtful they would have won any titles without him. I'm wondering whether people who dismiss his achievements actually ever watched him race?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 16681
Zoue wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Yeah that's utter nonsense I'm afraid. Of course he had competition and was challenged. He won 7 titles. How may of them ended in 1-2s with his team mate? He had to fight for most of them and the way people talk it's like he could just cruise around and take it easy. People seem to forget it's not a spec series and drivers are fighting other cars as much as they are other drivers. And it's not so long ago that people were praising Mika Hakkinen but now all of a sudden he doesn't count?

It's arguable that all but two of the titles Schumacher won may not have been won by a Benetton/Ferrari driver had Schumacher not been the driver in their car. He made the difference to the team and that's the reason he's considered a legend. In 1994 he only failed to finish 1st on two occasions when he finished a race, and then he finished 2nd. Yet when he had to sit out four races his team mates only just scraped two third places between them. The Benetton would have looked like a midfield car if almost any other driver would have been in it and it's doubtful they would have won any titles without him. I'm wondering whether people who dismiss his achievements actually ever watched him race?


:thumbup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 6788
Location: Nebraska, USA
I agree, Zoue & Mikey

It seems this comes up 3-4 times a year. You just responded better than I did.

_________________
Forza Ferrari
WCCs = 16
WDCs = 15


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33744
Blake wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)

That's no different from you saying that the drivers of today are not as good as the drivers of the past in particular the drivers of the 50s, 60s and 70s.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 6788
Location: Nebraska, USA
pokerman wrote:
Blake wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)

That's no different from you saying that the drivers of today are not as good as the drivers of the past in particular the drivers of the 50s, 60s and 70s.

???? Comparing Apples to Oranges, poker.

_________________
Forza Ferrari
WCCs = 16
WDCs = 15


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:29 am
Posts: 2011
Schumacher had to overcome a lot of fast Newey cars and I suppose Massa and Rosberg were his most modern teammates and in the twilight of his career long past his youthful peak he did well against an almost WDC and a WDC who beat Hamilton to get it.

_________________
Red Bull: "Now we can fight !" https://twitter.com/redbullracing/statu ... 1737202688


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 2333
Zoue wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Yeah that's utter nonsense I'm afraid. Of course he had competition and was challenged. He won 7 titles. How may of them ended in 1-2s with his team mate? He had to fight for most of them and the way people talk it's like he could just cruise around and take it easy. People seem to forget it's not a spec series and drivers are fighting other cars as much as they are other drivers. And it's not so long ago that people were praising Mika Hakkinen but now all of a sudden he doesn't count?

It's arguable that all but two of the titles Schumacher won may not have been won by a Benetton/Ferrari driver had Schumacher not been the driver in their car. He made the difference to the team and that's the reason he's considered a legend. In 1994 he only failed to finish 1st on two occasions when he finished a race, and then he finished 2nd. Yet when he had to sit out four races his team mates only just scraped two third places between them. The Benetton would have looked like a midfield car if almost any other driver would have been in it and it's doubtful they would have won any titles without him. I'm wondering whether people who dismiss his achievements actually ever watched him race?


But what did these teammates achieve elsewhere? Many of them would have made every car like a midfield car - which is exactly why they became his teammates.

But he did have competition by other teams, of course. Except of 2001, 2002 and 2004.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 2607
Zoue wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Yeah that's utter nonsense I'm afraid. Of course he had competition and was challenged. He won 7 titles. How may of them ended in 1-2s with his team mate? He had to fight for most of them and the way people talk it's like he could just cruise around and take it easy. People seem to forget it's not a spec series and drivers are fighting other cars as much as they are other drivers. And it's not so long ago that people were praising Mika Hakkinen but now all of a sudden he doesn't count?

It's arguable that all but two of the titles Schumacher won may not have been won by a Benetton/Ferrari driver had Schumacher not been the driver in their car. He made the difference to the team and that's the reason he's considered a legend. In 1994 he only failed to finish 1st on two occasions when he finished a race, and then he finished 2nd. Yet when he had to sit out four races his team mates only just scraped two third places between them. The Benetton would have looked like a midfield car if almost any other driver would have been in it and it's doubtful they would have won any titles without him. I'm wondering whether people who dismiss his achievements actually ever watched him race?


It's not remotely utter nonsense. Mika isn't remotely on the level of a Nadal or a Djokovic. As for the rest of your post, I don't disagree at all with it. Michael had to work for it and was a great driver etc. etc. etc. and was clearly ahead of his competition. In tennis the ongoing era has had 3 mega legends battling for over a decade. This simply wasn't the case in Schumacher's era. Senna tragically died and Schumacher caught Alonso toward the end. Mika was very good but not on the highest level. The current era was largely wasted because Alonso was in a rubbish car for many years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 2607
Blake wrote:
I agree, Zoue & Mikey

It seems this comes up 3-4 times a year. You just responded better than I did.



It was responded with a bunch of stuff I agree with which is some tangent which didn't deal with the comparison I was making.

That's it.

:thumbdown:

I suppose your response would have been equally as tangential. The only disagreement related to the comparison might be on the worth of Hakkinen - is he potentially a top-5 ATG? I'd say not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 2607
Blake wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
pokerman wrote:

I guess some people just don't like to see greatness?


Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)


Missed this.

No, I suggested he didn't have the strongest competition, which is a far cry from saying he had no competition or supposing he was an average talent who lucked into great cars or something similar. He inherited a void, a desolate wasteland, and dominated it along with Newey. The battle with someone on his level ended before it really got started, and when he came up against Alonso he lost.

It's not like I think Schumacher was bad or that he isn't either the 1st or 2nd best in the history of the sport.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 2607
Exediron wrote:
I remember the thread, and I liked it. Here's some of mine (including one that's the same as yours, and one that's quite different):

1. I also don't notice the halo anymore.

2. I'm not at all bothered by the engine noise, and in fact I think the old engines were too loud.

3. Vettel is not a comparable driver to Hamilton, and would fair little better than Bottas if they were teammates.

4. Formula One is a team championship, not a driver championship. Only team stats have true validity, as driver stats are wholly dependent on teams.

5. I'm tired of all three top teams.

I'll probably come up with some more later, but those are good for a start.


How might you compare Vettel to N.Rosberg?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 7628
Location: Michigan, USA
Invade wrote:
Exediron wrote:
I remember the thread, and I liked it. Here's some of mine (including one that's the same as yours, and one that's quite different):

1. I also don't notice the halo anymore.

2. I'm not at all bothered by the engine noise, and in fact I think the old engines were too loud.

3. Vettel is not a comparable driver to Hamilton, and would fair little better than Bottas if they were teammates.

4. Formula One is a team championship, not a driver championship. Only team stats have true validity, as driver stats are wholly dependent on teams.

5. I'm tired of all three top teams.

I'll probably come up with some more later, but those are good for a start.

How might you compare Vettel to N.Rosberg?

I think Vettel and Rosberg were very similar drivers: good qualifiers with lacking racecraft. I would expect them to be evenly matched as teammates.

_________________
PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 15 podiums): 3rd in 2016
TOP THREE CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): Champions in 2015 & 2018 | 2nd in 2017 & 2019
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 USA & P-F1 Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33744
Blake wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Blake wrote:
Invade wrote:
Frenk Biber wrote:
Hell no, but there is room for more than one. I think Messi is the greatest footballer but I am glad that his position is at least challenged by Ronaldo.


In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)

That's no different from you saying that the drivers of today are not as good as the drivers of the past in particular the drivers of the 50s, 60s and 70s.

???? Comparing Apples to Oranges, poker.

Same thing when looking to compare drivers from different eras.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 6788
Location: Nebraska, USA
Whatever you say, poker...

_________________
Forza Ferrari
WCCs = 16
WDCs = 15


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 8:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8028
pokerman wrote:
Blake wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Blake wrote:
Invade wrote:

In tennis there are 3 legends competing against each other, which has been the case for more than a decade. Who did Schumacher have who was even remotely on the level of Nadal or Djokovic.

Answer: Nobody, for the bulk of his career.

Oh, here we go again.... The Schumi had no competition line of reasoning. All the really good drivers dropped off the
Face of the earth when he got to F1 and returned when Lewis & Seb arrived. Th racing God's work in devious ways.
;)

That's no different from you saying that the drivers of today are not as good as the drivers of the past in particular the drivers of the 50s, 60s and 70s.

???? Comparing Apples to Oranges, poker.

Same thing when looking to compare drivers from different eras.

Not really. Apples and oranges


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 8:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8028
I was going to add that:

- Vettel can't get into a scrap with Hamilton without him spinning the car

But then again I'm not sure it's an unpopular opinion, it happens all the time lately!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 26, 2019 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:54 am
Posts: 2683
Here’s another one:

Alonso was extremely good at qualifying an average or poor car higher than it should be. But when pole position was a serious possibility, he was a bit of a choker.

Bahrain 2010
Germany 2010
Canada 2011
Hungary 2011

That’s something I noticed as I was watching old races from 2010 and 2011.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 26, 2019 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:54 am
Posts: 2683
Also,

Verstappen is literally the only thing that is currently keeping Formula 1 interesting. I’m not a huge Max fan, but I can’t even imagine F1 without him right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 7:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
KingVoid wrote:
Here’s another one:

Alonso was extremely good at qualifying an average or poor car higher than it should be. But when pole position was a serious possibility, he was a bit of a choker.

Bahrain 2010
Germany 2010
Canada 2011
Hungary 2011

That’s something I noticed as I was watching old races from 2010 and 2011.

I'm not sure I'd classify Germany 2010 as a bit of a choker. He was 0.002s off pole and comfortably beat his team mate by half a second. In Canada 2011 he had the biggest improvement of any of the front runners in Q3 (over Q2) so again, don't see that as choking in particular. I'll give you Bahrain 2010 but I'm not sure there's any conclusive evidence that the car was capable of pole in Hungary 2010. So I don't think 1-2 examples shows him as a choker in all fairness. Hamilton has missed out on three consecutive poles before Monaco in a car that was definitely capable and I don't think anyone would call him a qualifying choker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:33 pm
Posts: 10289
Location: Ireland
KingVoid wrote:
Also,

Verstappen is literally the only thing that is currently keeping Formula 1 interesting. I’m not a huge Max fan, but I can’t even imagine F1 without him right now.

It's like Montoya in the early 00s. He added vibrancy and flair to an otherwise dull demolition by one man/team

_________________
I don't rely entirely on God
ImageImage
I rely on Prost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:54 am
Posts: 2683
Zoue wrote:
KingVoid wrote:
Here’s another one:

Alonso was extremely good at qualifying an average or poor car higher than it should be. But when pole position was a serious possibility, he was a bit of a choker.

Bahrain 2010
Germany 2010
Canada 2011
Hungary 2011

That’s something I noticed as I was watching old races from 2010 and 2011.

I'm not sure I'd classify Germany 2010 as a bit of a choker. He was 0.002s off pole and comfortably beat his team mate by half a second. In Canada 2011 he had the biggest improvement of any of the front runners in Q3 (over Q2) so again, don't see that as choking in particular. I'll give you Bahrain 2010 but I'm not sure there's any conclusive evidence that the car was capable of pole in Hungary 2010. So I don't think 1-2 examples shows him as a choker in all fairness. Hamilton has missed out on three consecutive poles before Monaco in a car that was definitely capable and I don't think anyone would call him a qualifying choker.

Germany 2010 - Ferrari was fastest throughout the weekend apart from Q3 where Vettel pulled something special out of the hat. His gap to Webber was even bigger than Alonso’s gap to Massa.

Hungary 2011 - Alonso fastest in Q1, Q2 but then doesn’t even improve in Q3 while everyone ahead of him improves by a huge margin. He didn’t have any technical issues, he just messed up both laps.

There are some drivers, like Ricciardo, who are perhaps not as quick as Alonso over one lap, but extremely lethal when pole position is up for grabs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 6:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
KingVoid wrote:
Zoue wrote:
KingVoid wrote:
Here’s another one:

Alonso was extremely good at qualifying an average or poor car higher than it should be. But when pole position was a serious possibility, he was a bit of a choker.

Bahrain 2010
Germany 2010
Canada 2011
Hungary 2011

That’s something I noticed as I was watching old races from 2010 and 2011.

I'm not sure I'd classify Germany 2010 as a bit of a choker. He was 0.002s off pole and comfortably beat his team mate by half a second. In Canada 2011 he had the biggest improvement of any of the front runners in Q3 (over Q2) so again, don't see that as choking in particular. I'll give you Bahrain 2010 but I'm not sure there's any conclusive evidence that the car was capable of pole in Hungary 2010. So I don't think 1-2 examples shows him as a choker in all fairness. Hamilton has missed out on three consecutive poles before Monaco in a car that was definitely capable and I don't think anyone would call him a qualifying choker.

Germany 2010 - Ferrari was fastest throughout the weekend apart from Q3 where Vettel pulled something special out of the hat. His gap to Webber was even bigger than Alonso’s gap to Massa.

Hungary 2011 - Alonso fastest in Q1, Q2 but then doesn’t even improve in Q3 while everyone ahead of him improves by a huge margin. He didn’t have any technical issues, he just messed up both laps.

There are some drivers, like Ricciardo, who are perhaps not as quick as Alonso over one lap, but extremely lethal when pole position is up for grabs.

You said it yourself - Vettel pulled out a special lap in Germany 2010. That's not evidence of Alonso choking to be fair.

I still think Hungary 2011 isn't evidence of choking, either. Alonso improved by 7 tenths while both Hamilton and Vettel improved by 8 tenths and Massa by 6 tenths. Without knowing how balls to the wire Alonso was, or indeed the others were, in Q2 it's a stretch to say that he messed up in any way in Q3 and his improvement is on a par with the others. I think that's looking for fault tbh.

I'm just saying that the theory he chokes when pole is in sight isn't really supported by evidence of four races where at least two of them are highly questionable. I don't think it's a significant enough sample to base such a conclusion on and as already pointed out you can take at least four races from Hamilton's career where he should have got pole but didn't and few if any would say he's a qualifying choker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:23 pm
Posts: 82
Frenk Biber wrote:
-Michael Schumacher is the Lance Armstrong of F1.


I totally understand how disliked Schumacher is, but really? Comparing him with Armstrong? That's an unnecessary low blow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:54 am
Posts: 2683
Daniel Ricciardo is better than every 1-time WDC in my lifetime (I was born in the mid 90s)

Let’s compare him to each driver post-Mansell who has exactly one WDC to his name.

Hill? Ricciardo has significantly better racecraft and makes less errors. I’m convinced that Ricciardo would have ran Schumacher much closer in 1995.

Villeneuve? LMAO

Raikkonen? Ricciardo is much more adaptable. Kimi has an operation window the size of a pea. Kimi was phenomenal at McLaren but has looked mostly average since Michelin left the sport.

Button? Ricciardo clearly has him beat over one lap. Daniel bested Vergne, Vettel and Hulkenberg comfortably; and has only been bested by Verstappen. Buttons one lap pace was never anything special. Rubens, Perez and Magnussen matched in qualifying. Likewise, Button also lacked adaptability.

Rosberg? Ricciardo has him beat on racecraft. Rosberg was clumsy and lacked confidence at wheel to wheel racing. Danny Ric is one of the best in the business at this. With that said, Rosberg is the only one out of the five who is a match for Ricciardo on ultimate qualy pace.

Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 16681
Overall I'd say Button would be close but that's the only one I'd consider might be better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 8:07 am
Posts: 1306
KingVoid wrote:
Daniel Ricciardo is better than every 1-time WDC in my lifetime (I was born in the mid 90s)

Let’s compare him to each driver post-Mansell who has exactly one WDC to his name.

Hill? Ricciardo has significantly better racecraft and makes less errors. I’m convinced that Ricciardo would have ran Schumacher much closer in 1995.

Villeneuve? LMAO

Raikkonen? Ricciardo is much more adaptable. Kimi has an operation window the size of a pea. Kimi was phenomenal at McLaren but has looked mostly average since Michelin left the sport.

Button? Ricciardo clearly has him beat over one lap. Daniel bested Vergne, Vettel and Hulkenberg comfortably; and has only been bested by Verstappen. Buttons one lap pace was never anything special. Rubens, Perez and Magnussen matched in qualifying. Likewise, Button also lacked adaptability.

Rosberg? Ricciardo has him beat on racecraft. Rosberg was clumsy and lacked confidence at wheel to wheel racing. Danny Ric is one of the best in the business at this. With that said, Rosberg is the only one out of the five who is a match for Ricciardo on ultimate qualy pace.

Thoughts?


Much as i'm not a fan of Villeneuve I think as a WDC he deserves more analysis than LMAO!

Agree with most of this but I still feel Button is underrated and better than his stats suggest.

_________________
"I'd rather lose a race going fast enough to win it, than win one going slow enough to lose it".
-Stirling Moss


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 6:08 pm
Posts: 4445
Rather than simply rate a driver better than some of the 1x WDC's, I'd also look at the fact that there are possibly some that could easily have more than 1 WDC to their name. Hill is the obvious one - 94 - but others may have done with a slightly better car in different years. It's how all the cards fall that counts.

_________________
Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. [Lord Acton]
My own Google Earth Motor Sport file. http://www.mediafire.com/?jzm1ieatytv
Follow me @asphalt_world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:52 am
Posts: 2969
Here's an interesting take, having read the above: Damon Hill could well have been a 3xWDC (maybe 4?).
I'm not convinced that he should have won in 1994. Whilst that contact in Australia certainly denied him the title, he was only in a position to win it thanks to the races Schumacher was forced to miss by what I consider a heavy-handed approach by the powers-that-be. That said, he did a commendable job of picking up the team in the wake of Senna's death to take the fight to Schumacher and, as stated, was only denied in the final race.
I think that Schuey got into his head in 1995. Hill made a number of errors that ultimately cost him a crack at the title. Take that away and he should have won in what was a better Williams that Schumacher's Benetton.
Once he got his act together in 1996 - against a sub-par Ferrari that Schuey drive the pants off! - it was too late, in that Frank Williams had already decided to move him on. Had he had his contract extended to 1997 he may well have made a better job than Villeneuve in holding off Schuey over the season.
Btw I don't think that Hill was one of the more gifted drivers by a long way (in this sense I do rate Ricciardo above him). However he did show a lot of good work ethic and, in my mind, was ultimately deserving of a WDC.

_________________
Where I'm going, I don't need roads


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:54 am
Posts: 2683
DOLOMITE wrote:
KingVoid wrote:
Daniel Ricciardo is better than every 1-time WDC in my lifetime (I was born in the mid 90s)

Let’s compare him to each driver post-Mansell who has exactly one WDC to his name.

Hill? Ricciardo has significantly better racecraft and makes less errors. I’m convinced that Ricciardo would have ran Schumacher much closer in 1995.

Villeneuve? LMAO

Raikkonen? Ricciardo is much more adaptable. Kimi has an operation window the size of a pea. Kimi was phenomenal at McLaren but has looked mostly average since Michelin left the sport.

Button? Ricciardo clearly has him beat over one lap. Daniel bested Vergne, Vettel and Hulkenberg comfortably; and has only been bested by Verstappen. Buttons one lap pace was never anything special. Rubens, Perez and Magnussen matched in qualifying. Likewise, Button also lacked adaptability.

Rosberg? Ricciardo has him beat on racecraft. Rosberg was clumsy and lacked confidence at wheel to wheel racing. Danny Ric is one of the best in the business at this. With that said, Rosberg is the only one out of the five who is a match for Ricciardo on ultimate qualy pace.

Thoughts?


Much as i'm not a fan of Villeneuve I think as a WDC he deserves more analysis than LMAO!

Agree with most of this but I still feel Button is underrated and better than his stats suggest.

Villeneuve’s WDC is easily the worst I’ve ever seen. Apart from Australia he won no race on merit.

He’s comfortably a tier below the other four.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:31 am
Posts: 2192
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 9:39 pm
Posts: 3704
bourbon19 wrote:
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.

Did you watch the last three races?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8028
Alienturnedhuman wrote:
bourbon19 wrote:
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.

Did you watch the last three races?

This doesn't undo the first 10 races though. The WDC was pretty much sewn up half way through the season. Can't hold it against someone if they do a superb job, but I understand if people want to see something new


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33744
bourbon19 wrote:
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.

1. Well I think that's been somewhat squashed these past 3 years.
3. At last someone who supports reverse grids has actually admitted that.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8028
pokerman wrote:
bourbon19 wrote:
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.

1. Well I think that's been somewhat squashed these past 3 years.
3. At last someone who supports reverse grids has actually admitted that.


Willing to have a go is different to support


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33744
Siao7 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
bourbon19 wrote:
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.

1. Well I think that's been somewhat squashed these past 3 years.
3. At last someone who supports reverse grids has actually admitted that.


Willing to have a go is different to support

We're trying semantics now?

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:31 am
Posts: 8028
pokerman wrote:
Siao7 wrote:
pokerman wrote:
bourbon19 wrote:
1. Vettel is a far better driver than Hamilton. (I only believe comparisons are fair in a winning drive, so that is my basis).
2. Young drivers that are considered "hot shots" are given a lot of rope to hang themselves and usually do, to the detriment of the more experienced drivers.
3. I am bored of Mercedes supremacy. I am willing to give the reverse grid a try so long as it means that we get some competition.
4. The best team boss, hands down, is and is likely to ever be, Christian Horner.

1. Well I think that's been somewhat squashed these past 3 years.
3. At last someone who supports reverse grids has actually admitted that.


Willing to have a go is different to support

We're trying semantics now?

Trying???


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group