Armchair Expert wrote:
Cherry picking results, nice. In case you don't know - points are scored over whole season. Points scored in all races are equally important. At the end of the day driver who scored more points did better job. To give full picture analysis should include DNFs and mistakes. Maldonado had ridiculous number of them in 1st part of the season and then few in the second. It speaks volumes that with all Maldonado's brainfades Senna only scored 70% of that.
Williams know how much potential was in their car, and while Maldonado wasted it, Senna not only wasted it, but couldn't reach that potential. If you think you are smarter than F1 teams in rating drivers, fine, you can live in parallel universe where Senna is better driver of the two and maybe even he will become world champion. Meanwhile on planet Earth, in real world, decision was made and I think it was absolutely the right decision.
So for arguments sake, let's just say that 23 drivers crashed and only Karthikeyan finished the race taking 25 points, at the end of the day you would rate him above Pedro, Heikki, Vitaly, Timo and Charles because at the end of the season he was the only one to net his team points compared to none for the rest of them? That is in fact what you just said with that nonsensical post.
As I've always said, different drivers prefer different things and no one car will feel as good to one driver vs. another and therefore Driver A can win with a car where as his teammate would struggle to drive it a bit and would finish a little ways down the order. Take the Red bull this year as an example... Early on with the loss of the added grip of the EBDD Vettel wasn't as comfortable with the balance of the car and the slightly lesser level of rear grip under acceleration and found it more difficult to drive the car. After the 2nd iteration of updates were installed onto the car, suddenly he once again felt comfortable and the difference in his driving was clear. So, just because Pastor led Bruno a few times throughout the season and managed to get a victory does not make him better.
mikeyg123 wrote:
How has he proven to be better than any of them? the only one of them he has partnered is Maldanado and while being more consistent he is without doubt a chunk slower. In my opinion the only drivers you have listed he MAY be better than have only had 1 season and really could still improve. Senna is good but good just does not cut it in F1 at the moment - Ask Kovi, Sutil or Kobayashi.
This Myth about drivers being way slower has got to stop. It's utter nonsense. If you think a second is a huge difference, blink twice as fast as you can and that's the difference. Please explain how that categorizes a driver as being
"chunks slower". Think about how long a lap in F1 is and then divide that second (usually less) difference around the entire distance. that second would have to be broken to hundreds of thousandths if not millionths to spread it evenly. I cannot be certain that Bottas is indeed faster than both of them (we will see next year), but I am certain that Senna, like Heidfeld, brought the car home in the points and in one piece.