DaveStebbins wrote:
FringeUK wrote:
Worse still, if they do have inexperienced mechanics and drivers - it could be a real disaster for the other competitors. Do we really want other bits falling off and hitting cars/drivers again?
Isn't this the same argument people had when we added three new teams a few years ago? If I recall, they all did OK. They weren't the quickest, of course, but wasn't it the more experienced, 'professional,' teams that had wheels falling off and such?
That isn't quite what I was meaning - I was meaning in relation to presumably starting a team from scratch (i.e. mechanics and engineers), without any preseason construction, preparation or testing, etc, due to the lateness of purchase and entry acceptance (and that's ignoring any financial issues!). Imagine if they were given entry right now, and could only muster say half of the former HRT 'gang' together in the next few weeks, and could only manage to physically get to the first race, without any testing or preparation at all!
For my money, if they could acquire mostly all the HRT 'experienced' staff, that would mean they could at least have some confidence of a 'start' - and as an imaginary team principal, I would have no objection to them starting in that situation.
But I fear reality is far different, they need to have a car (approved and tested - I think even the 2012 car would need crash testing again if test requirements are different?) and 'trained up' staff - which you cannot do without a car, some premises, or some form of test facility and a good deal of time - none of which I imagine are available to them!
just can't see it myself - sure, if someone like Bernie stuffed a portion of his great wealth into such a venture, it might just manage (especially with him pulling strings!) - but for a new team, struggling for finance, etc, it is not really likely to happen!