Tufty wrote:
The most popular theory is that was Schumi brain fade in Spain...not dissimilar to Singapore except in daylight hours.
Bruno also got handed one of the harshest penalties in recent memory in Valencia IMO.
Asked why he didn't go to the complete left of Senna, Schumi said he would have done but he was already arriving in the braking zone, which was also a downhill braking zone, and he couldn't slow down sufficiently and steer left at he same time. His complaint was that Senna dummied right, then moved back left as he braked. I think the penalty was harsh as I don't really see how Michael could avoid it.
The Singapore incident was just Michael losing it under braking on cold brakes, unfortunately there were cars ahead of him because it was just after a safety car. That was a rookie mistake and it was his fault. So not really comparable. I don't really see why grid penalties are necessary for any whatsoever of these sort of incidents, being out of the race is punishment enough so why punish someone twice for the same crime. It doesn't make any sense. I'm not really a fan of grid penalties in general tbh, they spoiled the 2005 season.
I remember Senna getting a penalty in Valencia and yeah it was very harsh. Although I don't know why he was changing lines so unnecessarily while on worn tyres with faster cars behind him. There is a lot of GP2 in his racing, a bit like Grosjean, Perez, Hulkenberg et al, more seasons in F1 might have changed that (Maldonado meanwhile is on a different planet).
By GP2, I mean drivers like Schumacher or Raikkonen, every move they make on the track has a reason to it, a thought behind it, and otherwise they hold their line, but the GP2 guys tend to make moves just because they can, or for no apparent reason, as if they are looking for some clever move that isn't actually there. It all looks slightly frantic.
I think it's going to be like this for a while in the F1 midfield, because of the pay-driver-revolving-door, and a corresponding lack of driver experience like Barrichello, De La Rosa, Heidfeld, in the F1 midfield.
sennas move had purpose he had just lost his place to KR and was moving into his slipstream to try and keep up with him remember there were 5-6 drivers all within a second or two KK made what can only be described as an opportunist move,but senna was still at fault he should have double checked knowing there were so many drivers around, having said that i thought the actual penalty was harsh, as for Schumacher in Barcelona he could have avoided it because many other drivers have managed similar incidents without ramming the driver ahead. Infact many journalists and people around the paddock say that that incident alone has extremely lowered their opinions of him and tarnished his comeback even more than not reaching the heights he did because he blamed senna and wouldn't except he had messed up, it wasn't even the fact that he held senna responsible but that he was so public about it.