Race2win wrote:
Lentulus wrote:
Yeah because Prodrive has done such a great job in other series since.
Richards was only interested if he could purchase a Mclaren chassis', full customer teams have no place in F1 anymore.
Prodrive is one of the most successful outfits is the motorsports. They've won the WRC 5 times, and over a 100 other important rallies. Also they won the BTCC 5 times. Dave Richards was the same guy to mentor Colin Mcrae in WRC. In F1, Craig Pollock and JV were extremely close then At BAR. Craig Pollock was asked to leave. JV lost complete motivation then. Dave Richards was the guy who motivated JV who then went on to win many races. Dave Richards was the guy who transformed BAR Honda then. Thats just the brief history for you about Prodrive and Dave Richards. What is the problem with having a customer chassis to begin with. You know why he couldnt get through in the last selection process. It because Frank Williams vetoed the idea of customer chassis. The same Frank Williams who started his career in F1 with a customer chassis himself. Ferrari and Mclaren didnt have any problems with the entry. Withing a year or 2 they could have built their own chassis. Anyways the point I was making was it would have been a safe bet if Prodrive was let in then when 2 out of the 3 teams the FIA selected has packed up and left in the 3 yrs.
I know Prodrive's and Dave Richards' history (though it's pretty clear that your recollection is hazy), but what I said if you read my comment was that since being turned down for the 2008 F1 season Prodrive have been bad.
The last 'aero dependent' car they designed was the abysmal AMR-One, which in front of my very eyes completed 6 (yes six!) laps at Le Mans 2011 at incredibly slow speeds. After that they went back to racing the old Lola chassis they'd used previously and then scuttled back off to GTs.
Why people continually say Prodrive should've gotten the F1 gig is beyond me. They make good rally and GT cars sure, but why do people think that makes them fit for F1?