Eva09 wrote:
james10171 wrote:
People are forgetting that drivers like Kobayashi, who didn't shine in GP2, made an instant impact in F1.
So you can't necessarily conclude that drivers will be slow in F1, just because they were slow in GP2, GP3 etc.
However you will get quick pay drivers (maldonado) and slow pay drivers.
We've yet to see a pay driver that is the complete package in F1. Petrov wasn't too shabby to be fair, he handled Heidfeld pretty well but Kubica hammered him (kubica was supreme it has to be said).
I think you should just leave the different feeder series as it is.
Vettel came from F3 I think,
Whilst I do think Petrov wasn't that bad, Heidfeld was ahead 34-21 in points and 5-2 ahead when both finished in 2011, before being replaced by Bruno Senna. Amongst the drivers Senna, Petrov and Heidfeld, 5 of the teams best 7 finishes were recorded by Heidfeld.
You're trying to make out Heidfeld was clearly better than Petrov which was clearly not the case, with some fudging of the stats to help, points was 34-32 in Heidfelds favour and he had best 5 out of 8 best results, these are the positives.
The negatives for Heidfeld was his qualifying where he was dominated 8-3 by Petrov, its safe to say that more often than not when Petrov retired he probably was running in front of Heidfeld, when Heidfeld retired he would have been running behind Petrov, so i'd go with the overall finishing position as being 6-5 in Heidfelds favour.
So overall it was quite even between the two, the problem for Heidfeld was he was the paid driver and expected to be that much better than Petrov who at that time wasn't that highly rated.