Blackhander wrote:
That last bit sounds a lot like the oil system on most turbine engines, if they recycle it a lot of older designs just injected the used oil into the exhaust stream and were refilled before next flight.
I'm impressed at that Chevy sump, it's far more complex than anything I've seen on an aircraft. But then again I haven't touched a piston engines plane since training so I've no idea what they're doing now. It looks more like a tiny fuel tank to me, which is smart. Am I right in assuming the top right is the feed box and the other compartments are deprecated by flapper valves? If so once the oil moves right it has nowhere to go so no surging. Basically like building the oilcan into the sump, eliminates scavenge pumps and lines. Potentially lighter than a dry sump?
The current f1 system sounds almost identical to a turbine aircraft system. The engine I work on currently has 30 odd quarts of oil in the system but only 5 of that are ever in the oil tank (same thing as an oil can, only cast aloy and horizontal) we have 5 scavenge pumps throughout the engine all feeding back to the deoiler (stupid name as it removes air not oil) from the deoiler it feeds back to the tank and the oily air is simply ejected overboard. I find it amazing how so many seperate applications eventually settle on the same solution to a problem in applications that couldn't be further from each other
We actually build oil pans for aircraft a bit here and there. My boss was one of the first to build oil pans specific to application when everyone back in the day used stock steel cores. And yes the top right or right rear corner of that pan is the pick up box. The pan has an external oil pump so that's why you see that tube in the box which is the oil pick up. The doors have holes on the very bottom with hinge on the back side. Cars in on the gas the force of the oil moves backwards opening the hinge. Car brakes the force of the oil moves forward and close the hinge so the oil cannot escape the rear pick up