planetf1.com
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 4:05 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » F1 & Motorsport Forum

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 7
  [ 241 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Voices inside his head lol that's what I was thinking!

Mine tell me to do things but I ignore them!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
dave_the_fish
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 413
Location: Kent
That can't be happening[/quote]
I really don't care what you think, I heared what I heared[/quote][/quote]
I once heard that Lewis batters baby seals to death for fun! Must be true i heard it on the grapevine. There is a big problem with grapevine talk no way to disproof it

_________________
Lewis is to Twitter what Grosjean is to first corners.
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
dave_the_fish wrote:
That can't be happening

I really don't care what you think, I heared what I heared[/quote][/quote]
I once heard that Lewis batters baby seals to death for fun! Must be true i heard it on the grapevine. There is a big problem with grapevine talk no way to disproof it[/quote]

Really? I hadn't heard that rumour! But now I have... So does that make it tue??

Oh the paradox!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Mod_Blue
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 134
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Mod_Blue wrote:
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.


No worries Mod Blue, glad that sources are needed!

I guess we were reported for being nasty little boys but should we report unsubstantiated rumours?

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
Mod_Blue wrote:
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.

So, but calling someone having voices in his head is oK?
They suggest i'm schizophrenic, wich is a serious illness, and nothing to make jokes about!
Where is the rule that rumors have to have a named source?
Where is it said that every source has to be named?
Maybe we should wait and see what will be revealed, before calling someone crazy!

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
Mod_Blue
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 134
SilverstoneRegular wrote:
Mod_Blue wrote:
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.


No worries Mod Blue, glad that sources are needed!

I guess we were reported for being nasty little boys but should we report unsubstantiated rumours?

You probably don't need to report them, we'll generally notice those kinds of things quite quickly. If someone starts a thread with an unsubstantiated rumour then we usually lock it if the can't provide a source but we can't do much about an individual post in a thread.

As for your other question, no we didn't receive any reports but we did feel it was toeing the line just a tad! We have to be fair. :)

Mod Blue.
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Mod_Blue wrote:
SilverstoneRegular wrote:
Mod_Blue wrote:
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.


No worries Mod Blue, glad that sources are needed!

I guess we were reported for being nasty little boys but should we report unsubstantiated rumours?

You probably don't need to report them, we'll generally notice those kinds of things quite quickly. If someone starts a thread with an unsubstantiated rumour then we usually lock it if the can't provide a source but we can't do much about an individual post in a thread.

As for your other question, no we didn't receive any reports but we did feel it was toeing the line just a tad! We have to be fair. :)

Mod Blue.


Sorry I guess we were sailing close to the wind

Good luck in the future but I heard a rumour that you always get your guy just like a Canadian Mounty!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Mod_Blue
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 134
Haribo wrote:
Mod_Blue wrote:
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.

So, but calling someone having voices in his head is oK?
They suggest i'm schizophrenic, wich is a serious illness, and nothing to make jokes about!
Where is the rule that rumors have to have a named source?
Where is it said that every source has to be named?
Maybe we should wait and see what will be revealed, before calling someone crazy!

There is no general rule for sources Haribo. But without them you can't expect the whole forum to believe your word on it. Simple as that.

Like I said to SilverstoneRegular if someone starts an entire thread based on an unsubstantiated rumour then we will likely lock if it no source is provided simply because we know where it will head.

No one called you a schizophrenic. We have sent out a friendly warning to said posters that it was toeing the line. We have been fair to both parties here.

If you have anymore problems please take this to the Mod Feedback thread or PM me because we can't have this thread wandering any more off topic. Thank you.

Mod Blue.
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
Mod_Blue wrote:
Haribo wrote:
Mod_Blue wrote:
Guys maybe be a bit more friendly...

Haribo you really have to provide a source for your claims or they will get rubbished. The "grapevine" doesn't count as a source I'm afraid.


Mod Blue.

So, but calling someone having voices in his head is oK?
They suggest i'm schizophrenic, wich is a serious illness, and nothing to make jokes about!
Where is the rule that rumors have to have a named source?
Where is it said that every source has to be named?
Maybe we should wait and see what will be revealed, before calling someone crazy!

There is no general rule for sources Haribo. But without them you can't expect the whole forum to believe your word on it. Simple as that.

Like I said to SilverstoneRegular if someone starts an entire thread based on an unsubstantiated rumour then we will likely lock if it no source is provided simply because we know where it will head.

No one called you a schizophrenic. We have sent out a friendly warning to said posters that it was toeing the line. We have been fair to both parties here.

If you have anymore problems please take this to the Mod Feedback thread or PM me because we can't have this thread wandering any more off topic. Thank you.

Mod Blue.

I will

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
VDV23
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 9:04 pm
Posts: 522
If Lowe is put on a "gardening leave" wouldn't it be beneficial for all parties (Lowe - doing nothing 12 months, McLaren - getting him off their payroll, Merc - working for them) if they reach an agreement for cancelling the contract on mutual consent?
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
VDV23 wrote:
If Lowe is put on a "gardening leave" wouldn't it be beneficial for all parties (Lowe - doing nothing 12 months, McLaren - getting him off their payroll, Merc - working for them) if they reach an agreement for cancelling the contract on mutual consent?


No because he has intimate knowledge of this years McLaren and would benefit Mercedes immensely!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Pimpwerx
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 5:10 am
Posts: 155
The move is only positive. If Lowe wasn't any good, McLaren wouldn't have promoted him, and Merc wouldn't have tried to scoop him. Good pickup for them. Hopefully it bodes well for next year's car. PEACE.
Top
 Profile  
 
silkjet
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:42 pm
Posts: 167
Location: Wooded area of USA
Pimpwerx wrote:
The move is only positive. If Lowe wasn't any good, McLaren wouldn't have promoted him, and Merc wouldn't have tried to scoop him. Good pickup for them. Hopefully it bodes well for next year's car. PEACE.


Agree. Lauda may yet succeed, and Hamilton may prove the critics wrong.

Remember all the critics when Button left Brawn for McLaren "Oh he'll be slaughtered."
Top
 Profile  
 
DaveStebbins
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:09 pm
Posts: 318
dizlexik wrote:
DaveStebbins wrote:
Johnston wrote:
Whilst on Gardening leave he is still contracted to McLaren and not allowed to moonlight as it were. Breach of contract is breach of contract.

Does gardening leave mean he is still under contract and paid by McLaren, or is it simply part of a non-compete clause? I assumed it was the latter, where he is no longer employed by McLaren. The clause, which would have been part of his McLaren contract, kicks in when he leaves company employ and allows him to work in any job he likes, as long as it does not directly compete with McLaren. It doesn't stop him from being an Engineer, Designer or Manager, but just stops him from being one of those things in the same business (Formula 1) as McLaren, for the length of the non-compete clause.

Such clauses are fairly common in many Technical Industries in the US at least.

I bet he is still on McLaren payroll. McLaren must fulfill their contract with Paddy Lowe too.

OK, so it really isn't 'gardening leave' at all, then. Just reassignment pending the end of his contract.
Top
 Profile  
 
andrewinwork
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:46 pm
Posts: 33
Seems like Mercedes have lost patience with Brawn and the feed back of this years car was the straw that broke the camels back. As for McLaren thinking that Lowe will live in a bubble (allbeit a horticulrural one) is at best naive. Somewhere along the year there will be a discreet arrangement made, the plus side for mclaren being better terms for the 2014 Merc engine
Top
 Profile  
 
Johnston
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 6587
Thinking about it, if his talking to Merc is anything more than informal before his contract is up with Macca i.e. if he goes telling Merc Maccas secrets. With the new licensing thing for F1 Personnel I think if Macca push it they can have the FIA strip him of his licence.

_________________
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."
Top
 Profile  
 
andrewinwork
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:46 pm
Posts: 33
Johnston wrote:
Thinking about it, if his talking to Merc is anything more than informal before his contract is up with Macca i.e. if he goes telling Merc Maccas secrets. With the new licensing thing for F1 Personnel I think if Macca push it they can have the FIA strip him of his licence.


I can just imagine the phone call between Martin Whitmarsh and Mercedes if that happened

MW "Hi, just ringing to see if our engines are ready - oh and sorry about the whole stripping Paddy of his licence thing"

MW "Oh they're ready? Great, can we collect them"

MW "What you mean they've been ready for the last three months and sitting on a pallet outside in the rain...."
Top
 Profile  
 
Johnston
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 6587
Then Merc would be in breach of contract as that deal is signed and sealed.

Then again Macca might just have something else lined up ;)


Remember Paddy talking to Merc before his contract up isn't much different to Stepney talking to Macca in '07 I'm sure Merc are the last people that want involved in that shit again.

_________________
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."
Top
 Profile  
 
Laster
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:12 pm
Posts: 15
Paddy leave for Mercedes but it will nice to see if Brawn join McLaren in return!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
andrewinwork
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:46 pm
Posts: 33
Laster wrote:
Paddy leave for Mercedes but it will nice to see if Brawn join McLaren in return!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Ah Mr Brawn, welcome to Mclaren and here's your new desk. I asked Mercedes about whether they'll insist on a years garden leave, the chap on the other end laughed and said it wouldnt be necessary.....
Top
 Profile  
 
SILVAF0XX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:17 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Sheffield, England
I just can't see discreet telephone calls and even email being well policed.

Anyone could share such info without being traceable.... I know McLaren fell foul in '07, but really not hard to avoid being caught surely??

_________________
I try to make jokes... it's a defense mechanism - no offense is ever intended!
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
SILVAF0XX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:17 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Sheffield, England
I just can't see discreet telephone calls and even email being well policed.

Anyone could share such info without being traceable.... I know McLaren fell foul in '07, but really not hard to avoid being caught surely??

_________________
I try to make jokes... it's a defense mechanism - no offense is ever intended!
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Johnston
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 6587
SILVAF0XX wrote:
I just can't see discreet telephone calls and even email being well policed.

Anyone could share such info without being traceable.... I know McLaren fell foul in '07, but really not hard to avoid being caught surely??



Do you think Merc would want to be caught?

One of the reasons they split from McLaren was over '07. another spying scandel would not go down well in Stuttgart.

_________________
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."
Top
 Profile  
 
hundleton1
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:33 pm
Posts: 159
Perhaps Ross wants to retire ? Other projects perhaps. all that traveling is not good for family life.

He's got a big bag of cash perhaps he just wants to walk away at the end of the season.
Top
 Profile  
 
Johnston
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 6587
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/2 ... PD20130226

_________________
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226



It's about to hit the fan with some bashers!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
Mod_Blue
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 134
Be warned we are watching this thread very closely... Please don't start baiting one another.
Top
 Profile  
 
Johnston
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 6587
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."



Well obviously not ;)

_________________
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
He would be disappointed.. We yes that's a true statement

He didn't say he needed Lowe to stay or he'd have no chance in winning in the future

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
Johnston wrote:
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."



Well obviously not ;)

His own words, but why should someone believe it?
whatever losing Lowe is a huge blow to mcLaren however they want to twist it in the media

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
Dam_Noir
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 342
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."

What is Jenson supoosed to say? Would you honestly expect him to make some sort of admission to the media that McLaren is f***ed without Paddy?

I read nothing but praise for Paddy in that article and we all know F1 well enough to understand that any driver would never let on that the team he is employed by is weaker in some fashion with the departure of a member of staff. Whether or not that will be the case is anyone's guess.

_________________
"I don't make mistakes, I make prophecies that immediately turn out to be wrong."

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
Dam_Noir wrote:
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."

What is Jenson supoosed to say? Would you honestly expect him to make some sort of admission to the media that McLaren is f***ed without Paddy?

I read nothing but praise for Paddy in that article and we all know F1 well enough to understand that any driver would never let on that the team he is employed by is weaker in some fashion with the departure of a member of staff. Whether or not that will be the case is anyone's guess.

First he says he is not worried Lewis left, it would be worse Lowe left ( there my quote comes from)
Now Lowe leaves, but he talks now, like it does not matter.

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Haribo wrote:
Dam_Noir wrote:
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."

What is Jenson supoosed to say? Would you honestly expect him to make some sort of admission to the media that McLaren is f***ed without Paddy?

I read nothing but praise for Paddy in that article and we all know F1 well enough to understand that any driver would never let on that the team he is employed by is weaker in some fashion with the departure of a member of staff. Whether or not that will be the case is anyone's guess.

First he says he is not worried Lewis left, it would be worse Lowe left ( there my quote comes from)
Now Lowe leaves, but he talks now, like it does not matter.



He never said it doesn't matter, he talked about how great paddy is as a man and a coworker!

But he also says about McLaren having strength in depth

Like it or not McLaren existed before Lowe and Lewis and were bloody successful!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Johnston
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 6587
Haribo have you never heard of "toeing the company line" Every driver does it. Thats why you should never take anything any one in F1 says at face value.

_________________
Disclaimer: The above post maybe tongue in cheek.

"I thought I'd get your theories, mock them, then embrace my own. The usual."
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
SilverstoneRegular wrote:
Haribo wrote:
Dam_Noir wrote:
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/uk-motor-racing-mclaren-idUKBRE91P0PD20130226

"I'd be disappointed if Paddy Lowe moved from the team because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."

What is Jenson supoosed to say? Would you honestly expect him to make some sort of admission to the media that McLaren is f***ed without Paddy?

I read nothing but praise for Paddy in that article and we all know F1 well enough to understand that any driver would never let on that the team he is employed by is weaker in some fashion with the departure of a member of staff. Whether or not that will be the case is anyone's guess.

First he says he is not worried Lewis left, it would be worse Lowe left ( there my quote comes from)
Now Lowe leaves, but he talks now, like it does not matter.



He never said it doesn't matter, he talked about how great paddy is as a man and a coworker!

But he also says about McLaren having strength in depth

Like it or not McLaren existed before Lowe and Lewis and were bloody successful!

He said he would be dissappointed if Lowe leaves, because that's the guy who's going to help me achieve in the future."
So suddenly it does not matter, when he really leaves

Button contradicts himself

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Haribo

Where does it he say it doesn't matter?!

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Haribo
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:37 pm
Posts: 854
Johnston wrote:
Haribo have you never heard of "toeing the company line" Every driver does it. Thats why you should never take anything any one in F1 says at face value.

Does it only count for Button?
You can very well toe the company line and say nothing
but with his former statement about Lowe it's a bit akward

_________________
"Everything you can imagine is real." Pablo Picasso


Top
 Profile  
 
SilverstoneRegular
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:51 am
Posts: 1167
Haribo wrote:
Johnston wrote:
Haribo have you never heard of "toeing the company line" Every driver does it. Thats why you should never take anything any one in F1 says at face value.

Does it only count for Button?
You can very well toe the company line and say nothing
but with his former statement about Lowe it's a bit akward


You do realise Button had a day with the media today?

_________________
Multi 21 or Catch 22?!

It ain't hating just 'cause it's not love
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 7
  [ 241 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Board index » F1 & Motorsport Forum

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blinky McSquinty, Guia, JacobN, KIMBO2, Moore, RunningMan, SchumieRules, Skynyrd, Swarth, Warnzee, afterworks, Aussie Grit, Bing [Bot], GeonyWalker, hd23, jimmyj, lamo, rife_hypocricy and 74 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group