planetf1.com

very nice touch the shooting training app for age 4+

http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/01/14/t ... or-ages-4/

so let me make a short conclusion of some 'pro-gun' guys:
1. give same guns (assault rifles) to teachers
2. buy bullet proof jackets and rucksacks for kids
3. train kids on iphone how to shoot, so if the teacher is useless kids can shoot the intruder themselves.

very nice.

i think what you're forgetting Alien, is the physiological effort needed to shoot another living thing compared to a target or pretend person in video games.

Excerpt from Muad'Dib's January 7th, 2013 Critical Mass Radio interview:

...They used a poster child for this to get everybody's sympathy and to get everybody's emotions up so that they could hopefully bring in a gun ban. They used a little poster child, a little blonde-haired blue-eyed six year old girl. She was the face, the poster child. She was supposedly killed along with the other 19 six year olds and seven year olds at Sandy Hook. Three days later Obama was there doing a photo op and she's sitting on his knee. She's supposed to be dead, used as a poster child, this little girl died - she's sitting on Obama's knee three days later. The same little girl.

And then they have her parents interviewed. It shows that they're all actors. It never really happened, because the guy that was supposedly her dad, is shown in the video where he's to the side and he's laughing and joking with other people and then he's called up in front of the camera. He's off to the left. Then he's called to the center, to the focus of the camera to be interviewed and to give his speech about Sandy Hook and about his daughter. And he goes from on the side from laughing and joking with everybody, he comes up to the center and ... he takes the joking, smiling face off and you can see him physically trying to force his face to look sad and then he starts talking about how his daughter's been killed. They're actors. There were no bodies.

It was a made for TV drama to try to ram through the gun control laws, because they want to kill the American people and they can't kill armed people. That's why Hitler disarmed the Germans, it's why Stalin disarmed the Russians, it's why chairman Mao disarmed the Chinese and they killed between them something like 120 million of their own people. And that's what they want to do in America and they can't do it because the people have the Second Amendment and they have guns. So they have to do all of this, and they'll keep doing it. There will be more incidents like this, which are made for television, until they manage to persuade the American people to give up their guns. And then they'll start killing the Americans. Because the Americans are the only people stopping them from doing what they want to do already. They know they can't put their next phase, which is reducing the world's population, they can't put that phase into operation whilst the Americans have got millions of guns.

Anyone know anything about this radio interview thingy that says the whole sandy hook thing was faked?



Is it a bona Fide radio thing or just internet bull?

So if I'm reading that readio except correctly... the speaker/writer is suggesting that America wants to start killing off Americans by convincing Americans to give up their guns by killing Americans in American schools and blaming Americans with guns? As ATH put, are the American people that good that they need to be disarmed by the American government tries to kill them?

I think so, thats why I am wondering if it's real, fake or a parody.

You'd hope if was parody, otherwise that person really has paranoia problems.

Yeah but it's Americans. You can never really be sure if serious or not

The president urged Congress:

1. to reintroduce an expired ban on new purchases of "military-style" assault weapons, such as those used in several recent mass shootings
2. limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds and pass a ban on possession and sale of armour-piercing bullets
3. introduce background checks on all gun sales; currently private purchases and some transactions at gun shows are exempt
4. introduce harsher penalties for gun-traffickers, especially unlicensed dealers who buy arms for criminals
5. finally approve the appointment of the head of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

Yeah but it's Americans. You can never really be sure if serious or not

and this is what I found difficult to understand.

Here is a proposal by Obama to control guns (main points):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21049942



point 1 - can be argued by many if they want. I struggle to see why exactly civilians in a country that is in peace have a need to own military-style guns
point 2 - how limitation of 10-round per magazine equals 'ban on guns' puzzles me. Armour piercing bullets for civilians? Again, what is the purpose of having them by a law-abiding citizen in the peaceful country?
point 3 - isn't it the thing that would serve the same idea that 'pro' lobby pushes? 'no gun kill people, but guns in the hand of bad people'. It would maintain the right to have the gun, but limit bad guy in opportunity to buy the gun as easily as they can.
point 4 - the same. Good thing that goes together with the 'pro' lobby ideas.
point 5 - difficult to say.

After reading those ideas I just growing stronger that it is not 'little' gun owners that create main outcry about gun control. It is manufacturers and traders.