planetf1.com

It is currently Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:11 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 am
Posts: 10781
The FIA have updated the sporting code in order to incorporate new rules for obtaining a superlicence.
And while the idea in itself is OK, the execution is poor and the level of favoritism is beyond stupid.

A link: http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2015/01/06/f ... ts-system/

The system seems drawn up in a few categories:
1) FIA-mandated series are overvalued (non-existing F2, F3 euro)
2) FIA-linked series are in the mid (GP2, GP3)
3) Other series are undervalued (notably Renault racing series)

How else can one explain the fact that Formula Renault 3.5 is worth LESS than the F3 Euro championship? That FR2.0 is valued less than national F3 and even F4 series?

Being F3 Euro champion is enough to get a superlicence. In contrast, winning FR2.0 and FR3.5 on the bounce won't net you enough points for F1!

This is a major blow for the Renault racing series. Every driver will now prefer taking part in F3 and/or GP3, followed by GP2. Quality of the field will suffer immensely.

But not only that, this is also a hard situation for Red Bull's young driver programme. They can't bank on their normal route of FR2.0 > FR3.5, they will have to pass through either GP3 and/or GP2. The route via FR3.5 seems useless and that means they will have to leave their engine partner in the cold with their racing series.


Any thoughts? Isn't this incredible?

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 am
Posts: 10781
To add a point in case: Robin Frijns, one of the most promising junior drivers ever to be in single seaters, would NOT qualify for a superlicence in this system despite winning Formula BMW, FR2.0 and FR3.5 back to back.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:53 am
Posts: 668
Location: York, United Kingdom.
Its ludicrous. Playing politics with junior single seaters is not the way to go at all, 3.5's alumni of the last 4/5 seasons has been much more impressive as that of GP2. This could seriously mess some career's around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 12375
Its abysmal. They have taken a good idea and politicized it to the point where it does not make any sense.

Most of the drivers on the grid would fail to meet the points tariff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 21002
It just reinforces the points I made in the engine thread. The FIA seem very amateurish in how they go about creating the rules these days. Often they are very poorly thought out, with little thought for any potential negative consequences, and even more poorly executed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 23897
You have to believe that there is some political bias to the system because a lot of it makes no sense

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place

Wins: Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: 2nd Canada 2015, 3rd Monza 2016, Hungary 2016 and Barcelona 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:07 pm
Posts: 7706
The idea seems neat, but the points distribution makes absolutely no sense. I got a feeling in practice we still will see a lot of conditional licenses. Most of F1 teams needs money and drivers bring a lot of money with them. The issue is that they aren't always the best in junior series.

_________________
eeee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:05 am
Posts: 1054
And the FIA are absolutely stupid...


But hey, y'all asked for supelicence reforms because Verstappen is going to be "so dangerous" in an F1 car.

_________________
Image
"You mad, bro?"

"Noise is a form of energy and the less you hear means the more you use for propulsion" - Ulrich Baretzky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:41 pm
Posts: 358
The idea behind the system isn't that bad actually; It will give more value to good junior careers and may lower the number of average pay-drivers in Formula 1. The execution is poor however, the system is heavily skewed towards GP2, GP3 and the non-existent Formula 2 championship.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition: 10th (2014); 8th (2015)

PF1 Pick 3 Competition: 1st (2014); 1st (2015)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 23897
GPG wrote:
The idea behind the system isn't that bad actually; It will give more value to good junior careers and may lower the number of average pay-drivers in Formula 1. The execution is poor however, the system is heavily skewed towards GP2, GP3 and the non-existent Formula 2 championship.

GP2 is the top junior class so you confuse me there :?

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place

Wins: Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: 2nd Canada 2015, 3rd Monza 2016, Hungary 2016 and Barcelona 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:58 pm
Posts: 3796
It makes complete sense for the FIA though. Now all the best drivers and their sponsors will be lining up outside their door, making the FIA series stronger, bringing in more attention and money. It's the FIA monopolising. It's terrible news for FR and probably racing in general, but it's a good business move from the FIA. Bästards.

_________________
IV
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:00 pm
Posts: 4534
pokerman wrote:
GPG wrote:
The idea behind the system isn't that bad actually; It will give more value to good junior careers and may lower the number of average pay-drivers in Formula 1. The execution is poor however, the system is heavily skewed towards GP2, GP3 and the non-existent Formula 2 championship.

GP2 is the top junior class so you confuse me there :?

For the last several years the quality of the drivers at the top of FR3.5 has been on par with those at the top of GP2 yet this system puts FR3.5 on par with GP3 and winning FR2.0 equal to 6th in GP3.

_________________
{Insert clever sig line here}


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:48 pm
Posts: 157
The FIA have been trying to reorganise the junior formulae for quite a while now. Gerhard Berger was appointed in a head of development role a few years back, but recently left it.
I remember him saying that the junior 'ladder' is too messy, and it's difficult for teams' to know who is really the best driver as they aren't competing against each other.

The 'ladder' used to be pretty simple - Formula Ford - Formula 3 - Formula 3000 - Formula 1 (with various national and International series') . These were all, I think, FIA sanctioned and were all geared towards preparing drivers for the next step in their careers. At least that's how I perceived it.
Nowadays there are dozens of categories, with car performance levels that vary drastically.

It looks like the new system could be a way of promoting certain series', so that drivers/teams are forced to enter them if they want to further their careers along the FIA-approved path into F1.
While that is unfair to teams, drivers, sponsors and series organisers, I expect that in the board room it is seen as a step towards clarifying the 'ladder'.

_________________
Oooh I'm so badass... I've got a z in my name.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 12375
Ok so I have tried to work out all the drivers 26 or under who fulfill the criteria and have not already got a super licence.

Help me out if I have missed someone.

I am assuming they are not counting results from the defunct F2 series?

Jolyon Palmer
Stoffel Vandoorne
Mitch Evans
Fabio Leimer
Luis Razia
James Calado
Esteban Ocan
Tom Blomqvist
Raffaele Marciellio
Alex Lynn
Felix Rosenqvist
Daniel Juncadella
Pascal Wehrlein
Dean Stoneman
Facu Regallia
Daniel Abt
Antonio Felix Da Costa
Robert Wickens

Frijns is a grey area. It depends if they count formula BMW as a national F3 series.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:29 pm
Posts: 5712
Location: u.k
Someone on Reddit posted this

Spoiler: show
Dan787 wrote:
I've produced a league table for the 2015 drivers based on the number of points they would have had on their debut:
Lewis Hamilton 100
Nico Hulkenburg 90
Valtteri Bottas 70
Pastor Maldonado 68
Nico Rosberg 63
Romain Grosjean 60 (70 on 2012 return)
Felipe Nasr 52
Sergio Perez 42
Daniil Kvyat 42
---- ALL BELOW HERE FAIL THE FIA CRITERIA ---
Daniel Ricciardo 38
Sebastian Vettel 38 (45 in 2008)
Carlos Sainz Jr. 32
Fernando Alonso 20
Max Verstappen 20
Jenson Button 15
Marcus Ericcson 14
Felipe Massa 5
Kimi Raikonnen 0
Most of the drivers that score lower than expected have been let down by the FIA's low regard of the Formula Renault categories. It's also a tad unfair on the older drivers as many raced in competitions that don't exist/aren't relevant anymore (although where possible I converted to an obvious equivalent e.g. Formula 3000 = GP2).


Of the 9 race winner we have going into 2015, we lose 6. Of the 5 WDC, we lose 4.

_________________
Winter is Coming


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:29 pm
Posts: 5712
Location: u.k
It's as if F1 has put a lock on it's door, and is only giving it's own series the key. It's smart from their POV, but I don't see what good it does long term for F1. All it does is place more competition for spaces in "FIA approved" racing series, meaning less opportunity for talent to get through.

Also after reading through some of the articles, it seems that under these new rules, the most successful driver in the history of F1, may not have obtained a super-license to compete in F1 for his comeback. Also, it notably stops Susie Wolff from getting a super-license.

_________________
Winter is Coming


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 am
Posts: 10781
mikeyg123 wrote:
Pascal Wehrlein
Dean Stoneman
Facu Regallia
Daniel Abt
Robert Wickens


Can you explain how all of these qualify? I don't think they do?

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 am
Posts: 10781
RunningMan wrote:
Also after reading through some of the articles, it seems that under these new rules, the most successful driver in the history of F1, may not have obtained a super-license to compete in F1 for his comeback. Also, it notably stops Susie Wolff from getting a super-license.


It would rule out Kubica for a return if he would be fit again (which was unlikely to begin with). It would have prevented him of debuting as well.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:29 pm
Posts: 5712
Location: u.k
mds wrote:
RunningMan wrote:
Also after reading through some of the articles, it seems that under these new rules, the most successful driver in the history of F1, may not have obtained a super-license to compete in F1 for his comeback. Also, it notably stops Susie Wolff from getting a super-license.


It would rule out Kubica for a return if he would be fit again (which was unlikely to begin with). It would have prevented him of debuting as well.


and Barrichello (I've probably botched the hell out of his name)

I have a feeling the FIA will rewrite this rule pretty soon. It's very poorly worded atm even for the FIA standards.

_________________
Winter is Coming


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 21002
RunningMan wrote:
mds wrote:
RunningMan wrote:
Also after reading through some of the articles, it seems that under these new rules, the most successful driver in the history of F1, may not have obtained a super-license to compete in F1 for his comeback. Also, it notably stops Susie Wolff from getting a super-license.


It would rule out Kubica for a return if he would be fit again (which was unlikely to begin with). It would have prevented him of debuting as well.


and Barrichello (I've probably botched the hell out of his name)

I have a feeling the FIA will rewrite this rule pretty soon. It's very poorly worded atm even for the FIA standards.

How long is a super licence valid for, though? Does it have to be renewed every year, or once it's granted does it last for x years? It does seem strange that this would effectively prevent any driver from making a comeback and makes a sabbatical a dangerous choice. Would Kimi have qualified?

Ricciardo wouldn't have qualified under these rules:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2015/01/06/new-superlicence-rules-barred-ten-drivers-last-five-years/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 am
Posts: 10781
Zoue wrote:
RunningMan wrote:
mds wrote:
RunningMan wrote:
Also after reading through some of the articles, it seems that under these new rules, the most successful driver in the history of F1, may not have obtained a super-license to compete in F1 for his comeback. Also, it notably stops Susie Wolff from getting a super-license.


It would rule out Kubica for a return if he would be fit again (which was unlikely to begin with). It would have prevented him of debuting as well.


and Barrichello (I've probably botched the hell out of his name)

I have a feeling the FIA will rewrite this rule pretty soon. It's very poorly worded atm even for the FIA standards.

How long is a super licence valid for, though? Does it have to be renewed every year, or once it's granted does it last for x years? It does seem strange that this would effectively prevent any driver from making a comeback and makes a sabbatical a dangerous choice. Would Kimi have qualified?

Ricciardo wouldn't have qualified under these rules:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2015/01/06/new-superlicence-rules-barred-ten-drivers-last-five-years/


Kimi wouldn't have debuted. He won national FR2.0, which isn't even eligible for points.
Former F1 drivers are OK if they have raced 5 races in the previous year or 15 in the previous 3. Schumacher would not have qualified for an SL in 2010. Raikkonen would have in 2012.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:03 pm
Posts: 1242
The FIA seemingly have a stupid idea that compromises the integrity of the sport quota to fulfil every season.

_________________
===\ō͡≡\ō͡≡o˞̶ ===\ō͡≡\ō͡≡o˞̶ ===\ō͡≡\ō͡≡o˞̶ ===\ō͡≡\ō͡≡o˞̶ ===\ō͡≡\ō͡≡o˞̶===


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:29 pm
Posts: 5712
Location: u.k
mds wrote:
Zoue wrote:
How long is a super licence valid for, though? Does it have to be renewed every year, or once it's granted does it last for x years? It does seem strange that this would effectively prevent any driver from making a comeback and makes a sabbatical a dangerous choice. Would Kimi have qualified?

Ricciardo wouldn't have qualified under these rules:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2015/01/06/new-superlicence-rules-barred-ten-drivers-last-five-years/


Kimi wouldn't have debuted. He won national FR2.0, which isn't even eligible for points.
Former F1 drivers are OK if they have raced 5 races in the previous year or 15 in the previous 3. Schumacher would not have qualified for an SL in 2010. Raikkonen would have in 2012.


Yup :thumbup:
Also, it has to be renewed every year and is valid for one year only. Although it appears the FIA have left something in their rules to give them the ability to grant superlicenses to canditates who don't fulfill the points criteria
http://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/regulation/file/14.12.24_ANNEXE%20L%202015%20-publi%C3%A9%20le%2024%20d%C3%A9cembre%202014.pdf

Section 5 is the relevant part. Specifically 5.1.2

Quote:
be judged by the FIA to have consistently demonstrated outstanding ability in single-seater formula cars, but with no opportunity to qualify under any of c) to e) above. In this case the F1 team concerned must show that the applicant has driven at least 300 km in a current Formula One car consistently at racing speeds, over a maximum period of 2 days, completed not more than 90 days prior to the application and certified by the ASN of the country in which the test took place


Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this give the FIA the ability to grant people like Schumacher in 2010 SL's?

_________________
Winter is Coming


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 12375
mds wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
Pascal Wehrlein
Dean Stoneman
Facu Regallia
Daniel Abt
Robert Wickens


Can you explain how all of these qualify? I don't think they do?


Wehrlein has 40 points from a 2nd and a 4th at F3 Euro series

Stoneman you are right about he falls short by 5 points although the FIA could perhaps give him something for his F2 title. I think the FIA will probably fly lose with defunct series and probably give people some wiggle room.

Regallia has 40 points for the exact same reason as Wehrlein

Abt finished 2nd in GP2 and 2nd in national F3

And Wickens won GP3 and Formula Renault 3.5.


Although now I have just seen that drivers must accumulate these points in the three years preceding an application. Which is totally bannanas, unless you can apply for a super licence even if you will not be racing in F1 for the coming season.

I don't know it all just seems like another disaster to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 12375
RunningMan wrote:
mds wrote:
Zoue wrote:
How long is a super licence valid for, though? Does it have to be renewed every year, or once it's granted does it last for x years? It does seem strange that this would effectively prevent any driver from making a comeback and makes a sabbatical a dangerous choice. Would Kimi have qualified?

Ricciardo wouldn't have qualified under these rules:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2015/01/06/new-superlicence-rules-barred-ten-drivers-last-five-years/


Kimi wouldn't have debuted. He won national FR2.0, which isn't even eligible for points.
Former F1 drivers are OK if they have raced 5 races in the previous year or 15 in the previous 3. Schumacher would not have qualified for an SL in 2010. Raikkonen would have in 2012.


Yup :thumbup:
Also, it has to be renewed every year and is valid for one year only. Although it appears the FIA have left something in their rules to give them the ability to grant superlicenses to canditates who don't fulfill the points criteria
http://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/regulation/file/14.12.24_ANNEXE%20L%202015%20-publi%C3%A9%20le%2024%20d%C3%A9cembre%202014.pdf

Section 5 is the relevant part. Specifically 5.1.2

Quote:
be judged by the FIA to have consistently demonstrated outstanding ability in single-seater formula cars, but with no opportunity to qualify under any of c) to e) above. In this case the F1 team concerned must show that the applicant has driven at least 300 km in a current Formula One car consistently at racing speeds, over a maximum period of 2 days, completed not more than 90 days prior to the application and certified by the ASN of the country in which the test took place


Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this give the FIA the ability to grant people like Schumacher in 2010 SL's?


It gives the FIA another tool to use for political reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:07 am
Posts: 10781
mikeyg123 wrote:
Wehrlein has 40 points from a 2nd and a 4th at F3 Euro series

Stoneman you are right about he falls short by 5 points although the FIA could perhaps give him something for his F2 title. I think the FIA will probably fly lose with defunct series and probably give people some wiggle room.

Regallia has 40 points for the exact same reason as Wehrlein

Abt finished 2nd in GP2 and 2nd in national F3

And Wickens won GP3 and Formula Renault 3.5.


OK, Wehrlein you have a point although I'm not sure whether the partly-overlapping F3 Euroseries and the European F3 would count separately.
Stoneman falls short by 20 points (second in GP3 2014 is the only that counts as far as I see).
Regalia has 22 points - European F3 Open counts as a national series.
Abt was second in GP3, so only 20 points.
And Wickens was too long ago, as you have already noticed.

_________________
Go Vandoorne - Verstappen - Vettel!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 12375
mds wrote:
mikeyg123 wrote:
Wehrlein has 40 points from a 2nd and a 4th at F3 Euro series

Stoneman you are right about he falls short by 5 points although the FIA could perhaps give him something for his F2 title. I think the FIA will probably fly lose with defunct series and probably give people some wiggle room.

Regallia has 40 points for the exact same reason as Wehrlein

Abt finished 2nd in GP2 and 2nd in national F3

And Wickens won GP3 and Formula Renault 3.5.


OK, Wehrlein you have a point although I'm not sure whether the partly-overlapping F3 Euroseries and the European F3 would count separately.
Stoneman falls short by 20 points (second in GP3 2014 is the only that counts as far as I see).
Regalia has 22 points - European F3 Open counts as a national series.
Abt was second in GP3, so only 20 points.
And Wickens was too long ago, as you have already noticed.


To be honest if you look through my list a few will fail due to time by the end of this season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:31 am
Posts: 1949
It seems unfair at first glance, but what the FIA may be looking for is drivers progressing through the various series in an orderly fashion - i.e., drivers go from karts to 5 point series, then to 10 point series, then to 30 point series and finally into the higher point series. That way you ensure a certain level of experience where even the greatest talent can gain. Jumping series, say from 10 to 60 would occur only among the most talented and they would still have to finish in a stellar fashion to move on. So it could work assuming it doesn't play out in a hodgepodge manner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 21002
the question I have is what problem are they intending to address with this?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:30 am
Posts: 178
Zoue wrote:
the question I have is what problem are they intending to address with this?


1) Filtering out unskilled pay drivers, in a way that is transparent and fair to everyone

2) With the newer F1 cars being less of a physical challenge to drive, they want to ensure that a driver's maturity and racing qualifications are up to the task of actually getting behind the wheel of an F1 car, reliably and with good performance. The sheer difficulty of physically driving an F1 car used to do that, but the newer cars are getting easier to drive physically, so another way of preventing drivers that may be quick but lacking in other areas from starting too early. Remember, one way to be quick is to never care about the consequences...you can do that for a while, but eventually it will catch up to you - with potentially deadly affects on other drivers or spectators.

These rules make total sense to me, and I applaud them, even the weighting of the series makes sense (being done on how much like F1 the series is, the tracks they use, and the talent pool depth within that series).

I think the FIA did a good job on these.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:58 pm
Posts: 3796
Anyone know how many points Formula E would give you under this new system? I understand it's more of an alternative than a junior series, but it must count for something, as they have a field that ranks from F1 level to a few at the back that are GP3.

_________________
IV
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:25 pm
Posts: 392
The FIA again takes a hammer to their male appendage!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:25 pm
Posts: 392
AngusWolfe wrote:
Anyone know how many points Formula E would give you under this new system? I understand it's more of an alternative than a junior series, but it must count for something, as they have a field that ranks from F1 level to a few at the back that are GP3.

FE, from what I have seen of it, should subtract points from those earned elsewhere.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:59 pm
Posts: 5050
mmi16 wrote:
AngusWolfe wrote:
Anyone know how many points Formula E would give you under this new system? I understand it's more of an alternative than a junior series, but it must count for something, as they have a field that ranks from F1 level to a few at the back that are GP3.

FE, from what I have seen of it, should subtract points from those earned elsewhere.

FE from what I've seen of it is largely drivers who already have a super license!

_________________
There is no theory of evolution, just a list of animals that Chuck Norris allows to live.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 21002
futureshock999 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the question I have is what problem are they intending to address with this?


1) Filtering out unskilled pay drivers, in a way that is transparent and fair to everyone

2) With the newer F1 cars being less of a physical challenge to drive, they want to ensure that a driver's maturity and racing qualifications are up to the task of actually getting behind the wheel of an F1 car, reliably and with good performance. The sheer difficulty of physically driving an F1 car used to do that, but the newer cars are getting easier to drive physically, so another way of preventing drivers that may be quick but lacking in other areas from starting too early. Remember, one way to be quick is to never care about the consequences...you can do that for a while, but eventually it will catch up to you - with potentially deadly affects on other drivers or spectators.

These rules make total sense to me, and I applaud them, even the weighting of the series makes sense (being done on how much like F1 the series is, the tracks they use, and the talent pool depth within that series).

I think the FIA did a good job on these.

I meant in the sense what was the catalyst for it? Looking back over the years it would have stopped Paul DiResta and Charles Pic, but were they ever really an issue? OTOH it would also have prevented Ricciardo from starting when he did, which in retrospect would have left F1 poorer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 11:45 am
Posts: 830
Zoue wrote:
futureshock999 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the question I have is what problem are they intending to address with this?


1) Filtering out unskilled pay drivers, in a way that is transparent and fair to everyone

2) With the newer F1 cars being less of a physical challenge to drive, they want to ensure that a driver's maturity and racing qualifications are up to the task of actually getting behind the wheel of an F1 car, reliably and with good performance. The sheer difficulty of physically driving an F1 car used to do that, but the newer cars are getting easier to drive physically, so another way of preventing drivers that may be quick but lacking in other areas from starting too early. Remember, one way to be quick is to never care about the consequences...you can do that for a while, but eventually it will catch up to you - with potentially deadly affects on other drivers or spectators.

These rules make total sense to me, and I applaud them, even the weighting of the series makes sense (being done on how much like F1 the series is, the tracks they use, and the talent pool depth within that series).

I think the FIA did a good job on these.

I meant in the sense what was the catalyst for it? Looking back over the years it would have stopped Paul DiResta and Charles Pic, but were they ever really an issue? OTOH it would also have prevented Ricciardo from starting when he did, which in retrospect would have left F1 poorer.


Verstappen

_________________
Apparently religious people didn't like my signature, hah! Don't read it if you are so offended by it.

When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion. - Robert Pirsig


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 21002
sultanofhyd wrote:
Zoue wrote:
futureshock999 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the question I have is what problem are they intending to address with this?


1) Filtering out unskilled pay drivers, in a way that is transparent and fair to everyone

2) With the newer F1 cars being less of a physical challenge to drive, they want to ensure that a driver's maturity and racing qualifications are up to the task of actually getting behind the wheel of an F1 car, reliably and with good performance. The sheer difficulty of physically driving an F1 car used to do that, but the newer cars are getting easier to drive physically, so another way of preventing drivers that may be quick but lacking in other areas from starting too early. Remember, one way to be quick is to never care about the consequences...you can do that for a while, but eventually it will catch up to you - with potentially deadly affects on other drivers or spectators.

These rules make total sense to me, and I applaud them, even the weighting of the series makes sense (being done on how much like F1 the series is, the tracks they use, and the talent pool depth within that series).

I think the FIA did a good job on these.

I meant in the sense what was the catalyst for it? Looking back over the years it would have stopped Paul DiResta and Charles Pic, but were they ever really an issue? OTOH it would also have prevented Ricciardo from starting when he did, which in retrospect would have left F1 poorer.


Verstappen

they brought out a whole new set of rules just because of Verstappen? Is he even a pay driver?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:22 am
Posts: 1819
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Nope not a pay driver at all. Verstappen just ruffled a few feathers because of his age and comparative lack of experience. The rules seem more focused on ensuring a minimum number of years in single seat cars than ensuring a minimum level of ability.

I also think rather than preventing pay drivers it might make the situation much much worst. Especially given to how the series are weighted. There will be so much demand for a spot in GP3 and GP2 that only those drivers with the most sponsor backing will get a seat, and it seems that sponsor backing and driver talent rarely correlate. The drivers with the most points will be the ones who bring the most money to their GP teams, and in a few years the only drivers eligible for super licences may well be the pay drivers they are supposed to be trying to keep out.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition
Podiums: 1st Spa '16, 1st Bahrain '15, 1st China '14, 1st Malaysia '14
Championship position 2014: 13th | | 2015: 10th (heading the right way)
PF1 Autosport GP Predictor 2014: Second 2015: Second


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:58 pm
Posts: 3796
If Verstappen's experience was the issue, why not introduce it after Raikkonen ruffled feathers? I still think it's the FIA monopolising and using Verstappen as an excuse. I don't think the kid is ready either, but why make the FR series practically worthless? Unless they don't like the Red Bull Driver Program as a whole. Renault can't be happy about this, and considering Red Bull have Renault works deals, it gives Christian Horner another excuse to moan (surprised he hasn't started already).

_________________
IV
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:59 pm
Posts: 5050
AngusWolfe wrote:
If Verstappen's experience was the issue, why not introduce it after Raikkonen ruffled feathers? I still think it's the FIA monopolising and using Verstappen as an excuse. I don't think the kid is ready either, but why make the FR series practically worthless? Unless they don't like the Red Bull Driver Program as a whole. Renault can't be happy about this, and considering Red Bull have Renault works deals, it gives Christian Horner another excuse to moan (surprised he hasn't started already).

The way I see it, they want to make FR not worth as much toward a super licence in order to make their own series of GP3 and GP2 higher profile with potentially better drivers and less pay drivers. It may also be because more f1 viewers will watch GP2&3 and are less likely to also watch FR which would possibly make new drivers known to them and they can watch them progress.

I do the whole thing is to promote their own series rather to knock down others.

_________________
There is no theory of evolution, just a list of animals that Chuck Norris allows to live.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group